tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/.gitignore: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/Makefile: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/tags_test.c: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files ../security/commoncap.c:1359:41: warning: dubious: !x | y ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:239:34: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:239:34: struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu * ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:239:34: struct task_struct * ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:285:26: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:285:26: struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu * ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:285:26: struct task_struct * ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:288:34: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:288:34: struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu * ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:288:34: struct task_struct * ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:329:26: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:329:26: struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu * ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:329:26: struct task_struct * ../security/smack/smack_lsm.c:1944:61: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../security/smack/smack_lsm.c:1944:61: expected struct cred const *cred ../security/smack/smack_lsm.c:1944:61: got struct cred const [noderef] __rcu *cred ../security/smack/smack_lsm.c:5240:30: warning: cast removes address space '__rcu' of expression ../security/smack/smackfs.c:935:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/smack/smackfs.c:935:17: struct netlbl_lsm_catmap [noderef] __rcu * ../security/smack/smackfs.c:935:17: struct netlbl_lsm_catmap * ../security/smack/smackfs.c:1504:47: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../security/smack/smackfs.c:1507:47: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../security/smack/smackfs.c:1945:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/smack/smackfs.c:1945:17: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/smack/smackfs.c:1945:17: struct list_head * ../security/smack/smackfs.c:532:13: warning: context imbalance in 'smk_seq_start' - wrong count at exit ../security/smack/smackfs.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/vmalloc.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'smk_seq_stop' - unexpected unlock ../security/tomoyo/common.c:907:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:907:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:907:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:907:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:907:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:907:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1592:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1592:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1592:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1592:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1592:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1592:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1614:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1614:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1614:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1614:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1614:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1614:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1795:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1795:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1795:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1799:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1799:17: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1799:17: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1799:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1799:17: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1799:17: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1795:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1795:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1795:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1854:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1854:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1854:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1854:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1854:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1854:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:940:26: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../security/tomoyo/common.c:940:26: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../security/tomoyo/common.c:941:26: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../security/tomoyo/common.c:941:26: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../security/selinux/hooks.c:5451:22: warning: restricted __be16 degrades to integer ../security/selinux/hooks.c:5452:22: warning: restricted __be16 degrades to integer ../security/selinux/netnode.c:73:17: warning: restricted __be32 degrades to integer ../security/selinux/netnode.c:90:32: warning: restricted __be32 degrades to integer ../security/ipe/hooks.c:55: warning: Function parameter or struct member '__always_unused' not described in 'ipe_mmap_file' ../security/ipe/hooks.c:55: warning: Excess function parameter 'reqprot' description in 'ipe_mmap_file' ../security/ipe/hooks.c:83: warning: Function parameter or struct member '__always_unused' not described in 'ipe_file_mprotect' ../security/ipe/hooks.c:83: warning: Excess function parameter 'reqprot' description in 'ipe_file_mprotect' ../security/security.c: note: in included file: ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_2' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_3' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_4' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_5' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_6' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_7' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_8' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_9' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_10' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_11' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_12' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_13' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_2' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_3' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_4' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_5' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_6' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_7' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_8' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_9' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_10' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_11' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_12' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_13' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_2' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_3' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_4' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_5' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_6' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_7' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_8' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_9' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_10' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_11' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_12' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_13' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_2' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_3' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_4' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_5' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_6' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_7' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_8' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_9' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_10' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_11' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_12' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_13' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_2' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_3' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_4' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_5' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_6' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_7' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_8' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_9' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_10' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_11' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_12' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_13' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_2' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_3' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_4' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_5' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_6' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_7' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_8' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_9' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_10' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_11' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_12' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_13' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_2' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_3' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_4' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_5' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_6' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_7' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_8' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_9' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_10' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_11' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_12' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_13' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:41:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capset_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:41:1: warning: too many warnings Use of uninitialized value $param in regexp compilation at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1517, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $actual in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1469, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $actual in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1469, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1573, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in pattern match (m//) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1601, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1611, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in pattern match (m//) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1611, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1612, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in pattern match (m//) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1614, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in concatenation (.) or string at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1615, line 778. ../security/landlock/fs.c:778: warning: Function parameter or struct member '' not described in 'is_access_to_paths_allowed' Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1630, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in regexp compilation at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1517, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $actual in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1469, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $actual in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1469, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1573, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in pattern match (m//) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1601, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1611, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1630, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $parameterlist[3] in join or string at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1791, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $parameterlist[6] in join or string at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1791, line 778. ../security/landlock/fs.c:778: warning: Excess function parameter 'layer_masks_parent1' description in 'is_access_to_paths_allowed' ../security/landlock/fs.c:778: warning: Excess function parameter 'layer_masks_parent2' description in 'is_access_to_paths_allowed' Use of uninitialized value $param in regexp compilation at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1517, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $actual in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1469, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $actual in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1469, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $param in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1573, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $param in pattern match (m//) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1601, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1611, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $param in pattern match (m//) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1611, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1612, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $param in pattern match (m//) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1614, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $param in concatenation (.) or string at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1615, line 1010. ../security/landlock/fs.c:1010: warning: Function parameter or struct member '' not described in 'collect_domain_accesses' Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1630, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $parameterlist[3] in join or string at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1791, line 1010. ../security/landlock/fs.c:1010: warning: Excess function parameter 'layer_masks_dom' description in 'collect_domain_accesses' ../security/ipe/policy_fs.c:21: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'struct ipefs_file ' ../security/ipe/policy_fs.c:407: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'const struct ipefs_file policy_subdir[] = ' ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:59:30: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:59:30: expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] version ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:59:30: got restricted __le16 [usertype] ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:60:28: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:60:28: expected unsigned long long [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] count ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:60:28: got restricted __le64 [usertype] ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:61:34: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:61:34: expected unsigned long long [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] buffer_size ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:61:34: got restricted __le64 [usertype] ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:190:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:227:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:242:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:277:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:765:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:776:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:791:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1266:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_user_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1315:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_system_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1339:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_key_put' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1359:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3439:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_is_return' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3447:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_cookie' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2560:21: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2564:66: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'uprobe_prog_run' - unexpected unlock ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:344:12: warning: symbol 'btf_vmlinux' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:21247:38: error: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h): ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../kernel/bpf/btf.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf_verifier.h): ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/block/rnull_mod.o ../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static? tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/.gitignore: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/Makefile: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/tags_test.c: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:239:34: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:239:34: struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu * ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:239:34: struct task_struct * ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:285:26: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:285:26: struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu * ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:285:26: struct task_struct * ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:288:34: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:288:34: struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu * ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:288:34: struct task_struct * ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:329:26: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:329:26: struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu * ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:329:26: struct task_struct * ../security/ipe/hooks.c:55: warning: Function parameter or struct member '__always_unused' not described in 'ipe_mmap_file' ../security/ipe/hooks.c:55: warning: Excess function parameter 'reqprot' description in 'ipe_mmap_file' ../security/ipe/hooks.c:83: warning: Function parameter or struct member '__always_unused' not described in 'ipe_file_mprotect' ../security/ipe/hooks.c:83: warning: Excess function parameter 'reqprot' description in 'ipe_file_mprotect' ../security/ipe/policy_fs.c:21: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'struct ipefs_file ' ../security/ipe/policy_fs.c:407: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'const struct ipefs_file policy_subdir[] = ' ../security/smack/smackfs.c:935:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/smack/smackfs.c:935:17: struct netlbl_lsm_catmap [noderef] __rcu * ../security/smack/smackfs.c:935:17: struct netlbl_lsm_catmap * ../security/smack/smackfs.c:1504:47: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../security/smack/smackfs.c:1507:47: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../security/smack/smackfs.c:1945:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/smack/smackfs.c:1945:17: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/smack/smackfs.c:1945:17: struct list_head * ../security/smack/smackfs.c:532:13: warning: context imbalance in 'smk_seq_start' - wrong count at exit ../security/smack/smackfs.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/vmalloc.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'smk_seq_stop' - unexpected unlock ../security/commoncap.c:1359:41: warning: dubious: !x | y ../security/selinux/netnode.c:73:17: warning: restricted __be32 degrades to integer ../security/selinux/netnode.c:90:32: warning: restricted __be32 degrades to integer ../security/smack/smack_lsm.c:1944:61: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../security/smack/smack_lsm.c:1944:61: expected struct cred const *cred ../security/smack/smack_lsm.c:1944:61: got struct cred const [noderef] __rcu *cred ../security/smack/smack_lsm.c:5240:30: warning: cast removes address space '__rcu' of expression ../security/tomoyo/common.c:907:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:907:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:907:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:907:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:907:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:907:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1592:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1592:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1592:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1592:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1592:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1592:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1614:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1614:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1614:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1614:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1614:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1614:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1795:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1795:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1795:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1799:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1799:17: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1799:17: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1799:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1799:17: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1799:17: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1795:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1795:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1795:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1854:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1854:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1854:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1854:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1854:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1854:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:940:26: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../security/tomoyo/common.c:940:26: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../security/tomoyo/common.c:941:26: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../security/tomoyo/common.c:941:26: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../security/selinux/hooks.c:5451:22: warning: restricted __be16 degrades to integer ../security/selinux/hooks.c:5452:22: warning: restricted __be16 degrades to integer Use of uninitialized value $param in regexp compilation at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1517, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $actual in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1469, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $actual in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1469, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1573, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in pattern match (m//) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1601, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1611, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in pattern match (m//) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1611, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1612, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in pattern match (m//) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1614, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in concatenation (.) or string at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1615, line 778. ../security/landlock/fs.c:778: warning: Function parameter or struct member '' not described in 'is_access_to_paths_allowed' Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1630, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in regexp compilation at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1517, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $actual in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1469, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $actual in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1469, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1573, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in pattern match (m//) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1601, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1611, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1630, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $parameterlist[3] in join or string at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1791, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $parameterlist[6] in join or string at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1791, line 778. ../security/landlock/fs.c:778: warning: Excess function parameter 'layer_masks_parent1' description in 'is_access_to_paths_allowed' ../security/landlock/fs.c:778: warning: Excess function parameter 'layer_masks_parent2' description in 'is_access_to_paths_allowed' Use of uninitialized value $param in regexp compilation at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1517, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $actual in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1469, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $actual in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1469, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $param in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1573, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $param in pattern match (m//) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1601, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1611, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $param in pattern match (m//) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1611, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1612, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $param in pattern match (m//) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1614, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $param in concatenation (.) or string at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1615, line 1010. ../security/landlock/fs.c:1010: warning: Function parameter or struct member '' not described in 'collect_domain_accesses' Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1630, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $parameterlist[3] in join or string at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1791, line 1010. ../security/landlock/fs.c:1010: warning: Excess function parameter 'layer_masks_dom' description in 'collect_domain_accesses' ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:190:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:227:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:242:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:277:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:765:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:776:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:791:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1266:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_user_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1315:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_system_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1339:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_key_put' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1359:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3439:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_is_return' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3447:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_cookie' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2560:21: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2564:66: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'uprobe_prog_run' - unexpected unlock ../security/security.c: note: in included file: ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_2' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_3' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_4' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_5' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_6' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_7' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_8' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_9' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_10' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_11' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_12' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_13' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_2' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_3' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_4' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_5' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_6' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_7' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_8' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_9' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_10' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_11' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_12' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_13' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_2' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_3' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_4' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_5' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_6' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_7' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_8' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_9' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_10' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_11' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_12' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_13' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_2' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_3' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_4' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_5' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_6' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_7' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_8' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_9' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_10' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_11' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_12' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_13' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_2' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_3' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_4' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_5' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_6' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_7' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_8' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_9' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_10' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_11' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_12' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_13' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_2' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_3' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_4' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_5' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_6' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_7' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_8' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_9' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_10' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_11' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_12' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_13' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_2' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_3' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_4' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_5' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_6' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_7' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_8' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_9' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_10' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_11' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_12' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_13' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:41:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capset_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:41:1: warning: too many warnings ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:59:30: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:59:30: expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] version ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:59:30: got restricted __le16 [usertype] ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:60:28: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:60:28: expected unsigned long long [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] count ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:60:28: got restricted __le64 [usertype] ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:61:34: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:61:34: expected unsigned long long [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] buffer_size ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:61:34: got restricted __le64 [usertype] ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:344:12: warning: symbol 'btf_vmlinux' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:21247:38: error: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h): ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../kernel/bpf/btf.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf_verifier.h): ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/block/rnull_mod.o ../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static?