tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/.gitignore: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/Makefile: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/tags_test.c: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files tools/testing/selftests/kvm/config: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files tools/testing/selftests/kvm/settings: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files ../security/commoncap.c:1359:41: warning: dubious: !x | y ../ipc/shm.c:131:17: warning: context imbalance in 'do_shm_rmid' - unexpected unlock ../ipc/shm.c:290:17: warning: context imbalance in '__shm_open' - unexpected unlock ../ipc/shm.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'shm_destroy' - unexpected unlock ../ipc/shm.c:391:17: warning: context imbalance in '__shm_close' - unexpected unlock ../ipc/shm.c:409:12: warning: context imbalance in 'shm_try_destroy_orphaned' - wrong count at exit ../ipc/shm.c:446:26: warning: context imbalance in 'exit_shm' - different lock contexts for basic block ../ipc/shm.c: note: in included file (through ../arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h, ../include/linux/preempt.h, ../include/linux/spinlock.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h): ../arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:47:17: warning: context imbalance in 'newseg' - unexpected unlock ../ipc/shm.c:1034:9: warning: context imbalance in 'shmctl_down' - different lock contexts for basic block ../ipc/shm.c:1678:17: warning: context imbalance in 'do_shmat' - unexpected unlock ../init/main.c:192:12: warning: symbol 'envp_init' was not declared. Should it be static? ../init/main.c:290:16: warning: cast to restricted __le32 ../init/main.c:291:16: warning: cast to restricted __le32 ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:239:34: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:239:34: struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu * ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:239:34: struct task_struct * ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:285:26: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:285:26: struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu * ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:285:26: struct task_struct * ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:288:34: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:288:34: struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu * ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:288:34: struct task_struct * ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:329:26: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:329:26: struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu * ../security/yama/yama_lsm.c:329:26: struct task_struct * ../net/socket.c:1700:21: warning: symbol 'update_socket_protocol' was not declared. Should it be static? ../security/smack/smackfs.c:935:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/smack/smackfs.c:935:17: struct netlbl_lsm_catmap [noderef] __rcu * ../security/smack/smackfs.c:935:17: struct netlbl_lsm_catmap * ../security/smack/smackfs.c:1504:47: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../security/smack/smackfs.c:1507:47: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../security/smack/smackfs.c:1945:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/smack/smackfs.c:1945:17: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/smack/smackfs.c:1945:17: struct list_head * ../security/smack/smackfs.c:532:13: warning: context imbalance in 'smk_seq_start' - wrong count at exit ../security/smack/smackfs.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/vmalloc.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'smk_seq_stop' - unexpected unlock ../security/smack/smack_lsm.c:1944:61: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../security/smack/smack_lsm.c:1944:61: expected struct cred const *cred ../security/smack/smack_lsm.c:1944:61: got struct cred const [noderef] __rcu *cred ../security/smack/smack_lsm.c:5240:30: warning: cast removes address space '__rcu' of expression ../security/tomoyo/common.c:907:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:907:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:907:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:907:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:907:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:907:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1592:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1592:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1592:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1592:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1592:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1592:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1614:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1614:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1614:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1614:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1614:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1614:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1795:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1795:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1795:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1799:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1799:17: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1799:17: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1799:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1799:17: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1799:17: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1795:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1795:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1795:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1854:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1854:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1854:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1854:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1854:9: struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:1854:9: struct list_head * ../security/tomoyo/common.c:940:26: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../security/tomoyo/common.c:940:26: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../security/tomoyo/common.c:941:26: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../security/tomoyo/common.c:941:26: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../fs/namespace.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/xarray.h, ../include/linux/list_lru.h, ../include/linux/fs.h, ...): ../include/linux/rbtree.h:209:21: warning: context imbalance in 'mnt_ns_tree_add' - wrong count at exit ../fs/namespace.c:162:9: warning: context imbalance in 'mnt_ns_tree_remove' - different lock contexts for basic block ../fs/namespace.c:199:29: warning: context imbalance in 'lookup_mnt_ns' - wrong count at exit ../fs/namespace.c:2068:22: warning: context imbalance in '__lookup_next_mnt_ns' - wrong count at exit ../security/selinux/hooks.c:5451:22: warning: restricted __be16 degrades to integer ../security/selinux/hooks.c:5452:22: warning: restricted __be16 degrades to integer ../mm/filemap.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rculist.h, ../include/linux/dcache.h, ../include/linux/fs.h, ../include/linux/dax.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'filemap_fault_recheck_pte_none' - unexpected unlock ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:878:9: warning: context imbalance in 'filemap_map_pages' - different lock contexts for basic block ../security/ipe/hooks.c:55: warning: Function parameter or struct member '__always_unused' not described in 'ipe_mmap_file' ../security/ipe/hooks.c:55: warning: Excess function parameter 'reqprot' description in 'ipe_mmap_file' ../security/ipe/hooks.c:83: warning: Function parameter or struct member '__always_unused' not described in 'ipe_file_mprotect' ../security/ipe/hooks.c:83: warning: Excess function parameter 'reqprot' description in 'ipe_file_mprotect' ../security/selinux/netnode.c:73:17: warning: restricted __be32 degrades to integer ../security/selinux/netnode.c:90:32: warning: restricted __be32 degrades to integer ../security/security.c: note: in included file: ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_2' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_3' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_4' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_5' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_6' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_7' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_8' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_9' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_10' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_11' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_12' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:29:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_set_context_mgr_13' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_2' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_3' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_4' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_5' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_6' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_7' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_8' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_9' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_10' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_11' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_12' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:30:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transaction_13' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_2' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_3' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_4' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_5' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_6' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_7' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_8' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_9' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_10' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_11' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_12' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:32:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_binder_13' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_2' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_3' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_4' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_5' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_6' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_7' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_8' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_9' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_10' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_11' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_12' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:34:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_binder_transfer_file_13' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_2' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_3' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_4' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_5' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_6' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_7' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_8' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_9' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_10' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_11' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_12' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:36:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_access_check_13' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_2' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_3' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_4' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_5' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_6' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_7' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_8' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_9' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_10' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_11' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_12' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:38:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_ptrace_traceme_13' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_2' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_3' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_4' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_5' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_6' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_7' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_8' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_9' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_10' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_11' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_12' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:39:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capget_13' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:41:1: warning: symbol 'security_hook_active_capset_0' was not declared. Should it be static? ../include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h:41:1: warning: too many warnings ../security/ipe/policy_fs.c:21: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'struct ipefs_file ' ../security/ipe/policy_fs.c:407: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'const struct ipefs_file policy_subdir[] = ' Use of uninitialized value $param in regexp compilation at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1517, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $actual in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1469, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $actual in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1469, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1573, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in pattern match (m//) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1601, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1611, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in pattern match (m//) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1611, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1612, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in pattern match (m//) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1614, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in concatenation (.) or string at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1615, line 778. ../security/landlock/fs.c:778: warning: Function parameter or struct member '' not described in 'is_access_to_paths_allowed' Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1630, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in regexp compilation at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1517, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $actual in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1469, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $actual in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1469, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1573, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in pattern match (m//) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1601, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1611, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1630, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $parameterlist[3] in join or string at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1791, line 778. Use of uninitialized value $parameterlist[6] in join or string at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1791, line 778. ../security/landlock/fs.c:778: warning: Excess function parameter 'layer_masks_parent1' description in 'is_access_to_paths_allowed' ../security/landlock/fs.c:778: warning: Excess function parameter 'layer_masks_parent2' description in 'is_access_to_paths_allowed' Use of uninitialized value $param in regexp compilation at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1517, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $actual in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1469, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $actual in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1469, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $param in substitution (s///) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1573, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $param in pattern match (m//) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1601, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1611, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $param in pattern match (m//) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1611, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1612, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $param in pattern match (m//) at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1614, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $param in concatenation (.) or string at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1615, line 1010. ../security/landlock/fs.c:1010: warning: Function parameter or struct member '' not described in 'collect_domain_accesses' Use of uninitialized value $param in hash element at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1630, line 1010. Use of uninitialized value $parameterlist[3] in join or string at ../scripts/kernel-doc line 1791, line 1010. ../security/landlock/fs.c:1010: warning: Excess function parameter 'layer_masks_dom' description in 'collect_domain_accesses' ../mm/truncate.c:113:17: warning: context imbalance in 'truncate_folio_batch_exceptionals' - unexpected unlock ../fs/posix_acl.c:53:23: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../fs/posix_acl.c:53:23: struct posix_acl [noderef] __rcu * ../fs/posix_acl.c:53:23: struct posix_acl * ../fs/posix_acl.c:67:33: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../fs/posix_acl.c:67:33: struct posix_acl [noderef] __rcu * ../fs/posix_acl.c:67:33: struct posix_acl * ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:190:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:227:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:242:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:277:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:765:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:776:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:791:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1266:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_user_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1315:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_system_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1339:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_key_put' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1359:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3441:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_is_return' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3449:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_cookie' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2560:21: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2564:66: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'uprobe_prog_run' - unexpected unlock ../mm/vmscan.c:2583:1: warning: symbol 'lru_gen_caps' was not declared. Should it be static? ../mm/vmscan.c:805:28: warning: context imbalance in '__remove_mapping' - unexpected unlock ../mm/vmscan.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/mm.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'walk_pte_range' - unexpected unlock ../kernel/events/uprobes.c:2037:33: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../kernel/events/uprobes.c:2037:33: expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock ../kernel/events/uprobes.c:2037:33: got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * ../kernel/events/uprobes.c:2039:35: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../kernel/events/uprobes.c:2039:35: expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock ../kernel/events/uprobes.c:2039:35: got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * ../kernel/events/uprobes.c:2358:31: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../kernel/events/uprobes.c:2358:31: expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock ../kernel/events/uprobes.c:2358:31: got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * ../kernel/events/uprobes.c:2360:33: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../kernel/events/uprobes.c:2360:33: expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock ../kernel/events/uprobes.c:2360:33: got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * ../kernel/events/uprobes.c: note: in included file: ../include/linux/rmap.h:703:28: warning: context imbalance in '__replace_page' - unexpected unlock ../kernel/events/uprobes.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/xarray.h, ../include/linux/list_lru.h, ../include/linux/fs.h, ...): ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu * ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node * ../mm/workingset.c:777:9: warning: context imbalance in 'shadow_lru_isolate' - different lock contexts for basic block ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:59:30: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:59:30: expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] version ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:59:30: got restricted __le16 [usertype] ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:60:28: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:60:28: expected unsigned long long [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] count ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:60:28: got restricted __le64 [usertype] ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:61:34: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:61:34: expected unsigned long long [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] buffer_size ../security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:61:34: got restricted __le64 [usertype] ../fs/proc/task_mmu.c:890:17: warning: context imbalance in 'smaps_pte_range' - unexpected unlock ../fs/proc/task_mmu.c:1470:28: warning: context imbalance in 'clear_refs_pte_range' - unexpected unlock ../fs/proc/task_mmu.c:1827:28: warning: context imbalance in 'pagemap_pmd_range' - unexpected unlock ../fs/proc/task_mmu.c:2437:20: warning: context imbalance in 'pagemap_scan_thp_entry' - unexpected unlock ../fs/proc/task_mmu.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/mm.h, ../include/linux/pagewalk.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'pagemap_scan_pmd_entry' - unexpected unlock ../fs/proc/task_mmu.c:2943:28: warning: context imbalance in 'gather_pte_stats' - unexpected unlock ../mm/gup.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/mm.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'follow_page_pte' - unexpected unlock ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'get_gate_page' - unexpected unlock ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'gup_fast_pte_range' - unexpected unlock ../mm/mincore.c:111:17: warning: context imbalance in 'mincore_pte_range' - unexpected unlock ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:39:25: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_task_exe_file' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:55:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_put_file' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:79:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_path_d_path' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:108:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_dentry_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:146:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_file_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/squashfs/inode.c: note: in included file: ../fs/squashfs/squashfs_fs.h:393:46: warning: array of flexible structures ../mm/swap_state.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/mm.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'swap_vma_readahead' - unexpected unlock ../kernel/bpf/btf.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf_verifier.h): ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../mm/swapfile.c:601:13: warning: context imbalance in 'cluster_reclaim_range' - unexpected unlock ../mm/swapfile.c:729:23: warning: context imbalance in 'alloc_swap_scan_cluster' - different lock contexts for basic block ../mm/swapfile.c:1010:13: warning: context imbalance in 'swap_offset_available_and_locked' - wrong count at exit ../mm/swapfile.c:1212:9: warning: context imbalance in 'scan_swap_map_slots' - unexpected unlock ../mm/swapfile.c:1362:36: warning: context imbalance in 'swap_info_get_cont' - unexpected unlock ../mm/swapfile.c:435:9: warning: context imbalance in '__swap_entry_free' - different lock contexts for basic block ../mm/swapfile.c:435:9: warning: context imbalance in '__swap_entries_free' - different lock contexts for basic block ../mm/swapfile.c:1564:23: warning: context imbalance in 'swap_entry_range_free' - different lock contexts for basic block ../mm/swapfile.c:435:9: warning: context imbalance in 'cluster_swap_free_nr' - different lock contexts for basic block ../mm/swapfile.c:1644:38: warning: context imbalance in 'put_swap_folio' - different lock contexts for basic block ../mm/swapfile.c:1688:28: warning: context imbalance in 'swapcache_free_entries' - unexpected unlock ../mm/swapfile.c:435:9: warning: context imbalance in 'swap_swapcount' - different lock contexts for basic block ../mm/swapfile.c:435:9: warning: context imbalance in 'swp_swapcount' - different lock contexts for basic block ../mm/swapfile.c:435:9: warning: context imbalance in 'swap_page_trans_huge_swapped' - different lock contexts for basic block ../mm/swapfile.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rculist.h, ../include/linux/dcache.h, ../include/linux/fs.h, ../include/linux/highmem.h, ../include/linux/bvec.h, ../include/linux/blk_types.h, ...): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'unuse_pte' - unexpected unlock ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'unuse_pte_range' - unexpected unlock ../mm/swapfile.c:435:9: warning: context imbalance in '__swap_duplicate' - different lock contexts for basic block ../mm/swapfile.c:3858:23: warning: context imbalance in 'add_swap_count_continuation' - different lock contexts for basic block ../mm/madvise.c:198:17: warning: context imbalance in 'swapin_walk_pmd_entry' - unexpected unlock ../mm/madvise.c:424:28: warning: context imbalance in 'madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range' - unexpected unlock ../mm/madvise.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/mm.h, ../include/linux/mman.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'madvise_free_pte_range' - unexpected unlock ../fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:460:28: warning: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) ../fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:460:28: expected unsigned int ../fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:460:28: got restricted __wsum ../fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:460:28: warning: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) ../fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:460:28: expected unsigned int ../fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:460:28: got restricted __wsum ../fs/nfs/client.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/module.h): ../include/linux/list.h:229:25: warning: context imbalance in 'nfs_put_client' - unexpected unlock In file included from ../fs/orangefs/protocol.h:287, from ../fs/orangefs/acl.c:8: ../fs/orangefs/orangefs-debug.h:86:18: warning: ‘num_kmod_keyword_mask_map’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 86 | static const int num_kmod_keyword_mask_map = (int) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../fs/ubifs/journal.c:307:9: warning: context imbalance in '__queue_and_wait' - unexpected unlock ../fs/ubifs/journal.c:322:13: warning: context imbalance in 'wait_for_reservation' - different lock contexts for basic block ../fs/ubifs/journal.c:368:13: warning: context imbalance in 'add_or_start_queue' - different lock contexts for basic block In file included from ../fs/orangefs/protocol.h:287, from ../fs/orangefs/file.c:13: ../fs/orangefs/orangefs-debug.h:86:18: warning: ‘num_kmod_keyword_mask_map’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 86 | static const int num_kmod_keyword_mask_map = (int) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from ../fs/orangefs/protocol.h:287, from ../fs/orangefs/orangefs-cache.c:8: ../fs/orangefs/orangefs-debug.h:86:18: warning: ‘num_kmod_keyword_mask_map’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 86 | static const int num_kmod_keyword_mask_map = (int) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from ../fs/orangefs/protocol.h:287, from ../fs/orangefs/orangefs-utils.c:9: ../fs/orangefs/orangefs-debug.h:86:18: warning: ‘num_kmod_keyword_mask_map’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 86 | static const int num_kmod_keyword_mask_map = (int) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from ../fs/orangefs/protocol.h:287, from ../fs/orangefs/xattr.c:13: ../fs/orangefs/orangefs-debug.h:86:18: warning: ‘num_kmod_keyword_mask_map’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 86 | static const int num_kmod_keyword_mask_map = (int) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from ../fs/orangefs/protocol.h:287, from ../fs/orangefs/dcache.c:12: ../fs/orangefs/orangefs-debug.h:86:18: warning: ‘num_kmod_keyword_mask_map’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 86 | static const int num_kmod_keyword_mask_map = (int) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from ../fs/orangefs/protocol.h:287, from ../fs/orangefs/inode.c:15: ../fs/orangefs/orangefs-debug.h:86:18: warning: ‘num_kmod_keyword_mask_map’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 86 | static const int num_kmod_keyword_mask_map = (int) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from ../fs/orangefs/protocol.h:287, from ../fs/orangefs/orangefs-sysfs.c:146: ../fs/orangefs/orangefs-debug.h:86:18: warning: ‘num_kmod_keyword_mask_map’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 86 | static const int num_kmod_keyword_mask_map = (int) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from ../fs/orangefs/protocol.h:287, from ../fs/orangefs/orangefs-mod.c:11: ../fs/orangefs/orangefs-debug.h:86:18: warning: ‘num_kmod_keyword_mask_map’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 86 | static const int num_kmod_keyword_mask_map = (int) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from ../fs/orangefs/protocol.h:287, from ../fs/orangefs/super.c:8: ../fs/orangefs/orangefs-debug.h:86:18: warning: ‘num_kmod_keyword_mask_map’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 86 | static const int num_kmod_keyword_mask_map = (int) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../fs/orangefs/file.c:119:32: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../fs/orangefs/file.c:119:32: expected int open_for_write ../fs/orangefs/file.c:119:32: got restricted fmode_t ../fs/orangefs/file.c:120:31: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../fs/orangefs/file.c:120:31: expected int open_for_read ../fs/orangefs/file.c:120:31: got restricted fmode_t In file included from ../fs/orangefs/protocol.h:287, from ../fs/orangefs/devorangefs-req.c:11: ../fs/orangefs/orangefs-debug.h:86:18: warning: ‘num_kmod_keyword_mask_map’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 86 | static const int num_kmod_keyword_mask_map = (int) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from ../fs/orangefs/protocol.h:287, from ../fs/orangefs/namei.c:12: ../fs/orangefs/orangefs-debug.h:86:18: warning: ‘num_kmod_keyword_mask_map’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 86 | static const int num_kmod_keyword_mask_map = (int) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from ../fs/orangefs/protocol.h:287, from ../fs/orangefs/symlink.c:8: ../fs/orangefs/orangefs-debug.h:86:18: warning: ‘num_kmod_keyword_mask_map’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 86 | static const int num_kmod_keyword_mask_map = (int) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../mm/khugepaged.c:846:25: warning: symbol 'khugepaged_collapse_control' was not declared. Should it be static? ../mm/khugepaged.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/mm.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in '__collapse_huge_page_swapin' - unexpected unlock ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'collapse_huge_page' - unexpected unlock ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'hpage_collapse_scan_pmd' - unexpected unlock ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'collapse_pte_mapped_thp' - unexpected unlock ../mm/khugepaged.c:1767:28: warning: context imbalance in 'retract_page_tables' - different lock contexts for basic block ../mm/huge_memory.c:2040:20: warning: context imbalance in 'madvise_free_huge_pmd' - unexpected unlock ../mm/huge_memory.c:2078:28: warning: context imbalance in 'zap_huge_pmd' - unexpected unlock ../mm/huge_memory.c:2189:28: warning: context imbalance in 'move_huge_pmd' - unexpected unlock ../mm/huge_memory.c:2329:20: warning: context imbalance in 'change_huge_pmd' - unexpected unlock ../mm/huge_memory.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/pgtable.h, ../include/linux/mm.h): ../arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h:898:9: warning: context imbalance in 'change_huge_pud' - unexpected unlock ../mm/huge_memory.c:2411:28: warning: context imbalance in 'move_pages_huge_pmd' - unexpected unlock ../mm/huge_memory.c:2526:12: warning: context imbalance in '__pmd_trans_huge_lock' - wrong count at exit ../mm/huge_memory.c:2543:12: warning: context imbalance in '__pud_trans_huge_lock' - wrong count at exit ../mm/huge_memory.c:2569:28: warning: context imbalance in 'zap_huge_pud' - unexpected unlock ../mm/huge_memory.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/mm.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in '__split_huge_zero_page_pmd' - unexpected unlock ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in '__split_huge_pmd_locked' - unexpected unlock ../mm/huge_memory.c:3253:38: warning: context imbalance in '__split_huge_page' - unexpected unlock ../mm/huge_memory.c:3558:17: warning: context imbalance in 'split_huge_page_to_list_to_order' - different lock contexts for basic block ../mm/huge_memory.c:3960:17: warning: context imbalance in 'split_huge_pages_pid' - unexpected unlock In file included from ../fs/orangefs/protocol.h:287, from ../fs/orangefs/dir.c:6: ../fs/orangefs/orangefs-debug.h:86:18: warning: ‘num_kmod_keyword_mask_map’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 86 | static const int num_kmod_keyword_mask_map = (int) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from ../fs/orangefs/protocol.h:287, from ../fs/orangefs/orangefs-bufmap.c:7: ../fs/orangefs/orangefs-debug.h:86:18: warning: ‘num_kmod_keyword_mask_map’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 86 | static const int num_kmod_keyword_mask_map = (int) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../fs/orangefs/devorangefs-req.c:254:28: warning: context imbalance in 'orangefs_devreq_read' - different lock contexts for basic block ../mm/memcontrol.c:3877:52: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../mm/memcontrol.c:3877:52: struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu * ../mm/memcontrol.c:3877:52: struct task_struct * ../mm/memcontrol.c: note: in included file: ../include/linux/memcontrol.h:765:9: warning: context imbalance in 'folio_lruvec_lock' - wrong count at exit ../include/linux/memcontrol.h:765:9: warning: context imbalance in 'folio_lruvec_lock_irq' - wrong count at exit ../include/linux/memcontrol.h:765:9: warning: context imbalance in 'folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave' - wrong count at exit ../mm/memory-failure.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/mm.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'dev_pagemap_mapping_shift' - unexpected unlock ../mm/memory-failure.c:810:17: warning: context imbalance in 'hwpoison_pte_range' - unexpected unlock In file included from ../fs/orangefs/protocol.h:287, from ../fs/orangefs/waitqueue.c:16: ../fs/orangefs/orangefs-debug.h:86:18: warning: ‘num_kmod_keyword_mask_map’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 86 | static const int num_kmod_keyword_mask_map = (int) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../fs/jffs2/background.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rcuwait.h, ../include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h, ../include/linux/fs.h, ../include/linux/compat.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/ia32.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/elf.h, ...): ../include/linux/sched/signal.h:288:28: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../include/linux/sched/signal.h:288:28: expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock ../include/linux/sched/signal.h:288:28: got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * ../include/linux/sched/signal.h:290:30: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../include/linux/sched/signal.h:290:30: expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock ../include/linux/sched/signal.h:290:30: got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * ../include/linux/sched/signal.h:297:31: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../include/linux/sched/signal.h:297:31: expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock ../include/linux/sched/signal.h:297:31: got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * ../include/linux/sched/signal.h:302:33: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../include/linux/sched/signal.h:302:33: expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock ../include/linux/sched/signal.h:302:33: got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * ../fs/ceph/dir.c:1639:9: warning: context imbalance in '__dentry_leases_walk' - different lock contexts for basic block ../fs/jfs/xattr.c: note: in included file: ../fs/jfs/jfs_xattr.h:25:25: warning: array of flexible structures ../fs/f2fs/file.c:3496:36: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) ../fs/f2fs/file.c:3496:36: expected unsigned short const [usertype] *pwcs ../fs/f2fs/file.c:3496:36: got restricted __le16 * ../fs/f2fs/file.c:3532:28: warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) ../fs/f2fs/file.c:3532:28: expected unsigned short [usertype] *pwcs ../fs/f2fs/file.c:3532:28: got restricted __le16 * ../fs/bcachefs/acl.c: note: in included file: ../fs/bcachefs/bcachefs.h:997:9: warning: array of flexible structures ../fs/gfs2/inode.c:1879:14: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../fs/gfs2/inode.c:1879:14: struct gfs2_glock [noderef] __rcu * ../fs/gfs2/inode.c:1879:14: struct gfs2_glock * ../fs/f2fs/super.c: note: in included file (through ../include/trace/trace_events.h, ../include/trace/define_trace.h, ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h): ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: expected unsigned long mask ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: got restricted vm_fault_t ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: expected unsigned long mask ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: got restricted vm_fault_t ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: expected unsigned long mask ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: got restricted vm_fault_t ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: expected unsigned long mask ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: got restricted vm_fault_t ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: expected unsigned long mask ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: got restricted vm_fault_t ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: expected unsigned long mask ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: got restricted vm_fault_t ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: expected unsigned long mask ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: got restricted vm_fault_t ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: expected unsigned long mask ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: got restricted vm_fault_t ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: expected unsigned long mask ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: got restricted vm_fault_t ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: expected unsigned long mask ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: got restricted vm_fault_t ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: expected unsigned long mask ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: got restricted vm_fault_t ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: expected unsigned long mask ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: got restricted vm_fault_t ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: expected unsigned long mask ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: got restricted vm_fault_t ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: expected unsigned long flags ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: got restricted vm_fault_t [usertype] ret ../fs/f2fs/super.c: note: in included file (through ../include/trace/trace_events.h, ../include/trace/define_trace.h, ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h): ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1122:1: warning: cast to restricted blk_opf_t ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1122:1: warning: restricted blk_opf_t degrades to integer ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1122:1: warning: restricted blk_opf_t degrades to integer ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1122:1: warning: cast to restricted blk_opf_t ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1122:1: warning: restricted blk_opf_t degrades to integer ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1122:1: warning: restricted blk_opf_t degrades to integer ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1181:1: warning: cast to restricted blk_opf_t ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1181:1: warning: restricted blk_opf_t degrades to integer ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1181:1: warning: restricted blk_opf_t degrades to integer ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1181:1: warning: cast to restricted blk_opf_t ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1181:1: warning: restricted blk_opf_t degrades to integer ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1181:1: warning: restricted blk_opf_t degrades to integer ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: warning: cast to restricted vm_fault_t ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: warning: restricted vm_fault_t degrades to integer ../include/trace/events/f2fs.h:1410:1: warning: restricted vm_fault_t degrades to integer ../fs/f2fs/super.c:315:19: warning: symbol 'f2fs_cf_name_slab' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/f2fs/super.c:1459:35: warning: context imbalance in 'f2fs_drop_inode' - unexpected unlock ../fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:434:6: warning: context imbalance in 'btrfs_exclop_start_try_lock' - wrong count at exit ../fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:447:6: warning: context imbalance in 'btrfs_exclop_start_unlock' - unexpected unlock ../mm/userfaultfd.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/mm.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'mfill_atomic_install_pte' - unexpected unlock ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'mfill_atomic_pte_zeropage' - unexpected unlock ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'mfill_atomic_pte_poison' - unexpected unlock ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'move_pages_pte' - unexpected unlock ../mm/userfaultfd.c:1686:44: warning: context imbalance in 'move_pages' - unexpected unlock ../fs/bcachefs/fs.c: note: in included file: ../fs/bcachefs/bcachefs.h:997:9: warning: array of flexible structures ../fs/bcachefs/fs.c:177:13: warning: context imbalance in '__wait_on_freeing_inode' - unexpected unlock ../fs/bcachefs/fs.c:193:30: warning: context imbalance in 'bch2_inode_hash_find' - wrong count at exit ../drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_drv.c:276:20: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) ../drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_drv.c:276:20: expected void *regs ../drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_drv.c:276:20: got void [noderef] __iomem * ../drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_drv.c:291:30: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) ../drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_drv.c:291:30: expected void volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr ../drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_drv.c:291:30: got void * ../drivers/gpu/drm/tve200/tve200_drv.c:194:20: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) ../drivers/gpu/drm/tve200/tve200_drv.c:194:20: expected void *regs ../drivers/gpu/drm/tve200/tve200_drv.c:194:20: got void [noderef] __iomem * ../drivers/gpu/drm/tve200/tve200_drv.c:208:30: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) ../drivers/gpu/drm/tve200/tve200_drv.c:208:30: expected void volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr ../drivers/gpu/drm/tve200/tve200_drv.c:208:30: got void * ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:102: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'as' not described in 'panthor_mmu' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:102: warning: Excess struct member 'slots_lock' description in 'panthor_mmu' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:102: warning: Excess struct member 'alloc_mask' description in 'panthor_mmu' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:102: warning: Excess struct member 'faulty_mask' description in 'panthor_mmu' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:102: warning: Excess struct member 'slots' description in 'panthor_mmu' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:102: warning: Excess struct member 'lru_list' description in 'panthor_mmu' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:102: warning: Excess struct member 'lock' description in 'panthor_mmu' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:102: warning: Excess struct member 'list' description in 'panthor_mmu' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:102: warning: Excess struct member 'reset_in_progress' description in 'panthor_mmu' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:102: warning: Excess struct member 'wq' description in 'panthor_mmu' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:217: warning: Excess struct member 'count' description in 'panthor_vm_op_ctx' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:217: warning: Excess struct member 'ptr' description in 'panthor_vm_op_ctx' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:217: warning: Excess struct member 'page' description in 'panthor_vm_op_ctx' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:217: warning: Excess struct member 'addr' description in 'panthor_vm_op_ctx' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:217: warning: Excess struct member 'range' description in 'panthor_vm_op_ctx' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:217: warning: Excess struct member 'vm_bo' description in 'panthor_vm_op_ctx' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:217: warning: Excess struct member 'bo_offset' description in 'panthor_vm_op_ctx' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:217: warning: Excess struct member 'sgt' description in 'panthor_vm_op_ctx' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:217: warning: Excess struct member 'new_vma' description in 'panthor_vm_op_ctx' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:389: warning: Excess struct member 'start' description in 'panthor_vm' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:389: warning: Excess struct member 'size' description in 'panthor_vm' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:389: warning: Excess struct member 'id' description in 'panthor_vm' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:389: warning: Excess struct member 'active_cnt' description in 'panthor_vm' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:389: warning: Excess struct member 'lru_node' description in 'panthor_vm' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:389: warning: Excess struct member 'pool' description in 'panthor_vm' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:389: warning: Excess struct member 'lock' description in 'panthor_vm' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:412: warning: Cannot understand * @pt_cache: Cache used to allocate MMU page tables. on line 412 - I thought it was a doc line ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:481: warning: Cannot understand * @free_pt() - Custom page table free function on line 481 - I thought it was a doc line ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:707: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'vm' not described in 'panthor_vm_active' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:707: warning: Excess function parameter 'VM' description in 'panthor_vm_active' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:816: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'vm' not described in 'panthor_vm_idle' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:816: warning: Excess function parameter 'VM' description in 'panthor_vm_idle' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:1027: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'vm' not described in 'panthor_vm_alloc_va' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:1027: warning: Excess function parameter 'VM' description in 'panthor_vm_alloc_va' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:1059: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'vm' not described in 'panthor_vm_free_va' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:1059: warning: Excess function parameter 'VM' description in 'panthor_vm_free_va' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:1485: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'ptdev' not described in 'panthor_vm_pool_create_vm' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:1485: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'args' not described in 'panthor_vm_pool_create_vm' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:1485: warning: Excess function parameter 'kernel_va_start' description in 'panthor_vm_pool_create_vm' ../drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c:1485: warning: Excess function parameter 'kernel_va_range' description in 'panthor_vm_pool_create_vm' ../fs/nfs/pnfs.c:319:17: warning: context imbalance in 'pnfs_put_layout_hdr' - unexpected unlock ../fs/nfs/pnfs.c:624:17: warning: context imbalance in 'pnfs_put_lseg' - unexpected unlock ../fs/bcachefs/xattr.c: note: in included file: ../fs/bcachefs/bcachefs.h:997:9: warning: array of flexible structures ../fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/mm.h, ../fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h, ../fs/xfs/xfs.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'xfs_iget_recycle' - unexpected unlock ../fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c:621:28: warning: context imbalance in 'xfs_iget_cache_hit' - different lock contexts for basic block ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:345:12: warning: symbol 'btf_vmlinux' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:21303:38: error: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h): ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static? tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/.gitignore: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/Makefile: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/tags_test.c: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files tools/testing/selftests/kvm/config: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files tools/testing/selftests/kvm/settings: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:344:12: warning: symbol 'btf_vmlinux' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:21232:38: error: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h): ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static? tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/.gitignore: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/Makefile: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/tags_test.c: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files tools/testing/selftests/kvm/config: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files tools/testing/selftests/kvm/settings: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:345:12: warning: symbol 'btf_vmlinux' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:21303:38: error: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h): ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static?