WARNING: line length of 82 exceeds 80 columns
#124: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:1013:
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_prologue, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_SLEEPABLE)

WARNING: line length of 82 exceeds 80 columns
#125: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:1014:
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_epilogue, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_SLEEPABLE)

WARNING: line length of 86 exceeds 80 columns
#126: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:1015:
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_pro_epilogue, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_SLEEPABLE)

WARNING: line length of 92 exceeds 80 columns
#165: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:1166:
+	*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6, offsetof(struct st_ops_args, a));

WARNING: line length of 92 exceeds 80 columns
#167: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:1168:
+	*insn++ = BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_7, offsetof(struct st_ops_args, a));

WARNING: line length of 86 exceeds 80 columns
#173: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:1174:
+static int st_ops_gen_epilogue(struct bpf_insn *insn_buf, const struct bpf_prog *prog,

WARNING: line length of 92 exceeds 80 columns
#193: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:1194:
+	*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct st_ops_args, a));

WARNING: line length of 92 exceeds 80 columns
#195: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:1196:
+	*insn++ = BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6, offsetof(struct st_ops_args, a));

WARNING: line length of 97 exceeds 80 columns
#280: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:1291:
+	ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS, &bpf_testmod_kfunc_set);

WARNING: line length of 82 exceeds 80 columns
#283: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:1294:
+	ret = ret ?: register_bpf_struct_ops(&testmod_st_ops, bpf_testmod_st_ops);

WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#323: 
new file mode 100644

CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
#386: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pro_epilogue_kfunc.c:41:
+	asm volatile (

CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
#419: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pro_epilogue_kfunc.c:74:
+	asm volatile (

CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
#457: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pro_epilogue_kfunc.c:112:
+	asm volatile (

WARNING: line length of 96 exceeds 80 columns
#488: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pro_epilogue_kfunc.c:143:
+__retval(22022) /* (PROLOGUE_A [1000] + KFUNC_INC10 + SUBPROG_A [1] + EPILOGUE_A [10000]) * 2 */

CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
#538: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pro_epilogue_subprog.c:31:
+	asm volatile (

CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
#563: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pro_epilogue_subprog.c:56:
+	asm volatile (

CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
#593: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pro_epilogue_subprog.c:86:
+	asm volatile (

WARNING: line length of 82 exceeds 80 columns
#619: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pro_epilogue_subprog.c:112:
+__retval(22002) /* (PROLOGUE_A [1000] + SUBPROG_A [1] + EPILOGUE_A [10000]) * 2 */

total: 0 errors, 13 warnings, 6 checks, 540 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

Commit bdcaeb1e534e ("selftests/bpf: Test gen_prologue and gen_epilogue") has style problems, please review.

NOTE: Ignored message types: ALLOC_SIZEOF_STRUCT BAD_REPORTED_BY_LINK CAMELCASE COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE GIT_COMMIT_ID MACRO_ARG_REUSE NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
total: 0 errors, 13 warnings, 6 checks, 540 lines checked