WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#74: 
new file mode 100644

WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines
#89: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_compiler.h:11:
+/* In GCC -funroll-loops, which is enabled with -O2, should have the
+   same impact than the loop-unroll-enable pragma above.  */

WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line
#89: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_compiler.h:11:
+   same impact than the loop-unroll-enable pragma above.  */

ERROR: open brace '{' following function definitions go on the next line
#129: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iters.c:187:
+	__pragma_loop_no_unroll
 	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {

ERROR: open brace '{' following function definitions go on the next line
#138: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iters.c:242:
+	__pragma_loop_no_unroll
 	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {

ERROR: open brace '{' following function definitions go on the next line
#349: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_cls_redirect.c:273:
+	__pragma_loop_unroll_full
 	for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(struct iphdr) / 2; i++) {

ERROR: open brace '{' following function definitions go on the next line
#358: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_cls_redirect.c:300:
+	__pragma_loop_unroll_full
 	for (int i = 0; i < 6; i++) {

ERROR: open brace '{' following function definitions go on the next line
#380: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_lwt_seg6local.c:136:
+	__pragma_loop_unroll_full
 	for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {

ERROR: open brace '{' following function definitions go on the next line
#389: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_lwt_seg6local.c:307:
+	__pragma_loop_unroll_full
 	for (unsigned long long lo = 0; lo < 4; lo++) {

ERROR: open brace '{' following function definitions go on the next line
#411: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_seg6_loop.c:139:
+	__pragma_loop_no_unroll
 	for (long i = 0; i < 100; i++) {

ERROR: open brace '{' following function definitions go on the next line
#431: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skb_ctx.c:13:
+	__pragma_loop_unroll_full
 	for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {

ERROR: open brace '{' following function definitions go on the next line
#462: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sysctl_loop1.c:64:
+	__pragma_loop_no_unroll
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tcp_mem); ++i) {

ERROR: open brace '{' following function definitions go on the next line
#493: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sysctl_loop2.c:62:
+	__pragma_loop_no_unroll
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tcp_mem); ++i) {

ERROR: open brace '{' following function definitions go on the next line
#524: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sysctl_prog.c:62:
+	__pragma_loop_unroll_full
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tcp_mem); ++i) {

ERROR: open brace '{' following function definitions go on the next line
#665: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdping_kern.c:120:
+		__pragma_loop_unroll_full
 		for (i = 0; i < XDPING_MAX_COUNT; i++) {

total: 12 errors, 3 warnings, 0 checks, 468 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

Commit a3873c36ddcf ("bpf: abstract loop unrolling pragmas in BPF selftests") has style problems, please review.

NOTE: Ignored message types: ALLOC_SIZEOF_STRUCT BAD_REPORTED_BY_LINK CAMELCASE COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE GIT_COMMIT_ID MACRO_ARG_REUSE NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.